Evidence Hub

The impact of an app-delivered mindfulness-based intervention on resting-state functional connectivity in pediatric concussion: a pilot study

Brown O, Smith A, Cairncross M, Dodd AB, Goldfield GS, Gray C, Harris AD, Jaworska N et al.

Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026

20 participants

Abstract

Rationale: Concussion disrupts brain connectivity, and effective treatments remain limited. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) may influence functional connectivity (FC) of networks affected by concussion, but pediatric trials are lacking. This study investigated whether an app-delivered MBI produced greater FC changes than a sham condition across the default mode (DMN), salience (SN), and central executive (CEN) networks.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial (NCT05105802) recruited participants aged 12.00-17.99 years from the emergency department or interdisciplinary concussion clinic, then randomly assigned them to MBI or cognitive sham. Brain imaging sessions occurred at 72 h and 4 weeks post-concussion. Region-of-interest and seed-to-voxel analyses examined Group × Time interactions in FC across DMN, SN, and CEN (p FDR ).

Results: Thirty-six participants were included (MBI: n = 16, median [IQR] age = 14.23 [13.52-15.65] years, 31% female; Sham: n = 20, median [IQR] age = 14.05 [13.13-16.26] years, 45% female). Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant Group × Time interactions across networks. DMN-CEN FC patterns differed, with MBI participants showing diminished FC. Within DMN, four clusters showed significant interactions (p FDR ), three exhibiting larger FC reductions at 4 weeks in MBI participants. MBI participants showed greater FC increase in one SN cluster (p = 0.040 FDR ) and larger FC decrease in one CEN cluster (p = 0.024 FDR ) at 4 weeks.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free