Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with acute mountain sickness: a study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial

Tian YK, Wang X, Cao X, Ji HM, Wang BQ, Liu J

BMJ open, 2026

158 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Acute mountain sickness (AMS) commonly occurs during rapid ascent to high altitudes and significantly affects the health and cognitive function of travellers and specialised personnel in high-altitude environments. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive, safe and portable neuromodulation technique with potential benefits for AMS. This protocol evaluates taVNS efficacy for AMS and associated cognitive impairment and explores its mechanisms via multiomics analyses.

Methods and analysis: This is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled study involving ≥158 participants with AMS, who will be randomly assigned to receive either active or sham taVNS for five consecutive days. The primary outcome is the change in the 2018 Lake Louise AMS Score at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes are the Visual Analogue Scale for headache, Stanford Sleepiness Scale, Groningen Sleep Quality Questionnaire, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, cerebral oxygen saturation, Corsi task score and the Picture Recall Subscale of the Wechsler Adult Memory Scale, which collectively assess symptom relief, physiological responses and cognitive function. The exploratory outcomes include faecal and urinary metabolomics.

Ethics and dissemination: All investigations performed in this study were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 158 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free