Evidence Hub

The Efficacy of Nasyakarma and Snehapana in the Management of Migraine: A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Clinical Trial

S. Singh, Chandra Shekhar Singh, Kshipra Rajoria, Jyoti Kumawat

International Journal of Research in AYUSH, 2026

Abstract

This clinical trial was designed to determine and compare the efficacy of two treatment modalities,

Nasyakarma

(Nasal therapy) and

Snehapana

(Oral administration), using

Vrihatajivakadya Taila

(~a medicated oil) for the management of

Ardhavbhedaka

(~migraine).

This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, clinical trial. Sixty clinically diagnosed migraine patients were randomly assigned to either the

Nasyakarma

or the

Snehapana

. The

Nasya Karma

group received ~0.5 ml of

Vrihatajivakadya Taila

per nostril daily, while the

Sneha Pana

group received ~24 ml of the same oil orally after food in the evening for 14 days. The primary and secondary outcomes were to measure the changes in the migraine disability assessment scores (MIDAS) and migraine-specific quality of life scores, respectively.

The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test and the Mann–Whitney test were used for statistical analysis. The statistical significance level was set as significant at a 5% level (

P

< 0.05).

Both treatment groups demonstrated significant improvements in MIDAS and quality of life scores. However, the

Nasyakarma

group showed more improvement than the

Snehapana

group. Changes in MIDAS and migraine-specific quality of life scores were 2.533 ± 1.852 and 9.100 ± 5.268 in the

Nasyakarma

group and 1.600 ± 1.940 and 6.067 ± 5.564 in the

Snehapana

group, respectively. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported in either group, and AEs were not related to the treatments.

Nasyakarma

and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free