Evidence Hub

Development of the continuous ambulatory vestibular assessment (CAVA) system to provide an automatic diagnosis for vestibular conditions: protocol for a multicentre, single-arm, non-randomised clinical trial

John Phillips, Stephen J. Cox, G. Howard, J. High, Louisa Murdin, Ian Nunney, Peter Rea, L. Shepstone

BMJ Open, 2024

255 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Introduction Dizziness is a common symptom that can occur in an unpredictable and episodic manner leading to the imprecise reporting of symptoms. Patients will often see many specialists before receiving a diagnosis and treatments can vary in terms of risk and invasiveness which places a significant burden on health services. Achieving an early precise diagnosis could be key in reducing the impact of symptoms on patients and health services. Methods and analysis The continuous ambulatory vestibular assessment (CAVA) trial is a single-arm, non-randomised, multicentre diagnostic accuracy device trial that aims to quantify the extent to which the CAVA system can differentiate three common inner-ear causes of dizziness: Ménière’s disease, vestibular migraine and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. 85 participants with an established diagnosis from each of the three dizziness conditions, a total of 255 participants, will be recruited from ear, nose and throat, audiology and audiovestibular medicine departments in National Health Service (NHS) sites across the UK. The CAVA device is composed of two components: A set of bespoke single-use sensor arrays that adhere to the left and right side of the participant’s face; and a small reusable module fitting over the ear that contains a battery, a data storage facility and connection ports for the arrays. The CAVA device will be worn by all participants for up to 30 days with the aim of capturing eye movement data during a dizzy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 255 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free