Evidence Hub

Contralateral acupuncture for migraine without aura: a randomized trial protocol with multimodal MRI

Ziwen Chen, Qi-Fu Li, Yi Lu, Gaoyangzi Huang, Ya Huang, Xianmei Pei, Yiwei Gong, Bingkui Zhang et al.

Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2024

96 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction Migraine is a common clinical disorder, ranks as the second most disabling disease worldwide, and often manifests with unilateral onset. Contralateral acupuncture (CAT), as a classical acupuncture method, has been proven to be effective in the treatment of migraine without aura (MWoA). However, its neural mechanisms have not been investigated using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods and analysis In this multimodal neuroimaging randomized trial, a total of 96 female MWoA participants and 30 female healthy controls (HCs) will be recruited. The 96 female MWoA participants will be randomized into three groups: Group A (CAT group), Group B [ipsilateral acupuncture (IAT) group], and Group C (sham CAT group) in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. Each group will receive 30 min of treatment every other day, three times a week, for 8 weeks, followed by an 8-week follow-up period. The primary outcome is the intensity of the migraine attack. Data will be collected at baseline (week 0), at the end of the 8-week treatment period (weeks 1–8), and during the 8-week follow-up (weeks 9–16). Adverse events will be recorded. Multimodal MRI scans will be conducted at baseline and after 8-week treatment. Discussion This study hypothesized that CAT may treat MWoA by restoring pathological alterations in brain neural activity, particularly by restoring cross-integrated functional connectivity with periaqueductal gray (PAG) as the core pathological brain region. The findings…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 96 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free