Evidence Hub

A Feasibility Trial on Intranasal Evaporative Cooling for Acute Migraine in an At-Home Setting

Moa Wolff, I. Winnberg, E. Tronvik, M. F. Bakhsheshi, Patrik Midlov

Cureus, 2024

15 participants

Abstract

Background: A significant proportion of people with migraine do not achieve sufficient relief of their acute migraine symptoms with the currently available medications. A previous study showed that intranasal evaporative cooling reduced headache and migraine-associated symptoms when given in an outpatient clinic setting. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of self-administering the same intervention for acute migraine in an at-home setting. The findings of this study were intended to inform the design and implementation of a planned full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods: We conducted a prospective single-group clinical feasibility trial in southern Sweden. Participants meeting the criteria for episodic migraine, with or without aura, were recruited through local advertisements. After a screening period, during which two migraine attacks were registered and evaluated under usual care, participants treated their next three migraine attacks at home with 10 minutes of intranasal cooling (RhinoChill®, BrainCool AB, Lund, Sweden). The primary outcome was a reduction in headache, nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia immediately after treatment. The secondary outcome was tolerability, and treatment effects within 24 hours. Results: Six out of 15 participants completed the study, using the cooling treatment for three consecutive migraine attacks. The main reasons for drop-out were pain/discomfort from treatment and lack of effect. A total of 23 treatments…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free