Evidence Hub

Eptinezumab treatment was associated with longer interictal headache/migraine periods which corresponded to greater improvements in patient-reported quality of life measures

Tepper SJ, Diamond ML, Hirman J, Asher D, Fiore D, Cady R

Journal of neurology, 2024

1,072 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Longer periods between headache episodes (interictal periods) may provide greater time for the nervous system to reset from a previous episode, potentially improving disease status and health-related quality of life. This post hoc analysis evaluated this hypothesis by associating patients' longest interictal periods with improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS: PROMISE-2 (NCT02974153) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating eptinezumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine (N = 1072). Daily electronic diary data from Weeks 1-12 and Weeks 1-24 were used to identify interictal periods, defined as days between headache episodes. For each patient, the longest interictal period within these intervals was identified and categorized (1-4, 5-9, 10-14, > 14, and > 21 days). For each category, the following patient-reported outcomes were assessed: 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and patient-identified most bothersome symptom (PI-MBS).

RESULTS: Excluding interictal periods with > 10% missing data (resulting in 1010 patients with sufficient data), the mean (SD) of longest interictal periods over Weeks 1-12 was 9.4 (11.0) days. A ≥6-point HIT-6 reduction was observed in 78% (56/72) vs 26% (91/351) of patients with a > 21-day vs 1-4-day longest interictal period, respectively; much or very much improvement per PGIC was reported in 90% (65/72) vs 25% (87/348), respectively, and per PI-MBS was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,072 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free