Evidence Hub

Prior Psychiatric Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress, Depressive and Anxiety Disorder after Traumatic Brain Injury with Glasgow Coma Scale Score 13-15: A TRACK-TBI Study

Eagle SR, Nelson LD, Giacino JT, McCrea MA, Barber J, Temkin N, Yue JK, Okonkwo DO et al.

Neurotrauma reports, 2025

1,947 participants

Abstract

The most consistent risk factor for developing psychiatric problems post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a preexisting psychiatric disorder, but many studies have reported that psychiatric disorders can occur de novo following "mild" TBI. The objective of this secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients (n = 1,947) with acute TBI and presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13 and 15 was to describe the association of pre-injury psychiatric history with prevalence and risk factors for probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and nonspecific anxiety disorder (ANX) following TBI at long-term follow-up. Rates of probable PTSD, MDD, or ANX were analyzed from years 1 to 7 post-injury. Multivariable regression models were built to predict meeting cutoffs for PTSD, MDD, and ANX at 1 year, 2-4 years, and 5-7 years post-injury. Predictors were psychiatric history, migraine history, TBI history, initial head CT scan, loss of consciousness, post-traumatic amnesia, GCS, insurance type, highest level of care, cause of injury, years of education, age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Participants with history of pre-injury psychiatric disorder met clinical cutoffs for PTSD, MDD, and ANX at approximately double the rate of participants without history of psychiatric disorder at year 1 (16-28% vs. 5-13%), between years 2 and 4 (15-35% vs. 6-18%), and between years 5 and 7 (10-28% vs. 5-12%). Multivariable modeling confirmed several…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,947 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free