Evidence Hub

Post-Traumatic Headache in Children and Genetic Risk of Migraine: An Observational Cohort Study

Orr SL, Hershey AD, Kurowski BG, Langevin LM, Martin LJ, Pilipenko V, Tang K, Beauchamp MH et al.

Neurology. Genetics, 2026

646 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between genetic risk of migraine and post-traumatic headache (PTH) in children.

METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a cohort study that recruited children aged 8-17 years within 48 hours of concussion or orthopedic injury (OI) from 5 pediatric emergency departments and followed them for 6 months. Genetic risk of migraine was estimated through (1) family history of migraine, (2) polygenic risk scores (PRSs), and (3) forty individual single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). PTH was categorized as: no PTH (no PTH), PTH nonmigraine phenotype (PTH-NM), or PTH migraine phenotype. Ordinal regression models with cluster-adjusted standard errors and restricted cubic splines were used to estimate associations between genetic risk of migraine and increasing severity of PTH (no PTH vs PTH-NM vs PTH migraine phenotype), adjusting for injury type (concussion vs OI), age, sex, time since injury, first principal component, deprivation indices, concussion history, and preinjury headache history.

RESULTS: The sample included 646 children (median [interquartile range] age = 12.38 [10.52-14.41] years, including 436 (67.5%) with concussion. Family history of migraine was associated with increasing severity of PTH in 2/5 models (rs7684253 model: χ2 = 3.99, df = 1, p = 0.046; rs75002882 model: χ2 = 4.02, df = 1, p = 0.045), while migraine PRS was not (χ2 = 12.95, df = 12, p = 0.373). Four SNPs were associated with increasing severity of PTH…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 646 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free