Evidence Hub

Effects of Strength Training on Neck Muscle Function and Tenderness in Patients with Chronic Headache: A Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial

Padrós-Augé J, Espí-López GV, Schytz HW, Søgaard K, Donat-Roca R, Olsen HB, Madsen BK

Journal of clinical medicine, 2025

22 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study presents a secondary analysis from a previously published trial on strength training and postural correction in chronic headache patients. Here, we investigate changes in neck muscle function and tenderness, and their relationship with headache symptoms. Methods: A total of 22 headache patients from a single-arm open-label trial were included in this study to assess muscle function and tenderness. The maximum voluntary contraction of neck flexion and extension, shoulder elevation, and craniocervical flexion test were performed at baseline, week eight, and week 14. The extension/flexion ratio of the neck, the rate of force development, and the early rate of force development for shoulder elevation were calculated. Muscle tenderness was analyzed using the total tenderness score (TTS) and correlations between these outcomes and headache changes were explored. Results: After the intervention muscle tenderness significantly decreased (-5.6 ± 6.4; p < 0.001) and significant improvements in muscle function were observed. Correlations of muscle function showed a significant and moderate correlation between TTS and extension/flexion ratio (Spearman rho: 0.567, p = 0.014). Conclusions: The results indicate that strength training and postural correction improve muscle function and reduce pericranial tenderness in patients with chronic headaches. These findings suggest that muscle tenderness and extension/flexion ratio may be useful for monitoring…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free