Evidence Hub

Hypothalamic subregional volume in relation to VSS-C total symptom burden in women with migraine: an exploratory cross-sectional MRI study

Lin-Yi Che, Wan-Qun Hu, Xiao-Ping Fan, Qin-Lian Huang, Ruo-Nan Zhang, Yu-Hui Xu, Liang Dong, Li Jiang et al.

Frontiers in Neurology, 2026

39 participants

Abstract

Dizziness, vertigo, and related autonomic symptoms are common in migraine, but whether their combined symptom-frequency burden is associated with hypothalamic subregional structure remains unclear.

This exploratory cross-sectional secondary analysis included 39 women with ICHD-3-defined migraine. All source T1-weighted images were processed uniformly with FreeSurfer 7.4.1 and automated hypothalamic subunit segmentation. Blinded quality control was performed without clinical data and independently confirmed by a neuroradiologist. The exposure was VSS-C total score, a composite of vertigo-balance and autonomic-anxiety symptom frequency. Models for five bilateral subunits and whole-hypothalamus volume adjusted for age, estimated total intracranial volume, and baseline monthly migraine days; Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate correction was applied across the six outcomes. Outcome-specific quality-control denominators were 37 or 39.

Anterior-superior hypothalamic volume was associated with VSS-C total score (n = 39; β = 0.165 mm

3

per point, 95% confidence interval 0.064 to 0.266,

p

= 0.0021; BH-FDR-adjusted

p

= 0.0127). The association remained after restricting all six outcomes to the same 37 participants (BH-FDR-adjusted

p

= 0.0334). Across the observed 20-point VSS-C interquartile range, the coefficient corresponded to 3.31 mm

3

, or 8.54% of mean anterior-superior volume. DHI identified the same subregion in a separately corrected supporting analysis, but mutual…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 39 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free