Evidence Hub

Value of lumbar puncture in identifying secondary causes of visual snow syndrome: A case-control study

T. Mader, Antonia Klein, E. Wenz, A. Scutelnic, N. Slavova, S. De Beukelaer, Laura Weichsel, M. Horn et al.

Cephalalgia, 2026

36 participants

Abstract

Aim Visual Snow Syndrome (VSS) typically begins in early life with no significant diagnostic findings in the neurological and ophthalmological workups. Still, secondary forms of VSS have been reported. This study examines the diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and the search for autoimmune encephalitis antibodies in patients with VSS. Methods In this retrospective case-control study, CSF samples from 36 VSS patients were analyzed and compared to a control group matched for age, sex, and migraine. In addition, serum and CSF antibodies associated with autoimmune encephalitis or paraneoplastic syndromes were analyzed in VSS patients. Cases with CSF abnormalities were further characterized. Results No significant systematic differences in CSF cell count or protein levels were observed between VSS patients (n = 36) and controls (n = 31). CSF abnormalities in the VSS group included elevated cell counts (n = 4), elevated protein level (n = 1) and oligoclonal bands (n = 1). Autoantibodies associated with autoimmune encephalitis or paraneoplastic syndromes were not detected in either serum or CSF of VSS patients. Conclusion This corresponds to grade 3b evidence (case-control study), suggesting that lumbar puncture and search for autoimmune encephalitis should not be routinely performed in patients presenting with typical VSS without red flags for additional comorbidities. Graphical abstract This is a visual representation of the abstract.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 36 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free