Evidence Hub

GFAP as a marker of astrocytic damage correlated with medication overuse in migraine

Carta S, Chiodega V, Tiberi R, Pasquali A, Ferrari S, Bozzetti S, Ranieri F, Marchioretto F et al.

Immunologic research, 2025

25 participants

Abstract

Different mechanisms are involved in migraine pathogenesis, including neurogenic inflammation, neurodegenerative processes, and a potential role of microglia. The aim of this study was to assess axonal and glial damage measuring serum levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in migraine patients. Serum samples of 25 patients with episodic migraine (EM), 25 with chronic migraine (CM) diagnosed in accordance with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3), and 50 age-matched healthy controls were prospectively collected. NfL and GFAP levels were assessed using ultrasensitive paramagnetic bead-based ELISA (SIMOA). Non-parametric tests were used for group comparison and 2-tailed Spearman analysis to assess correlations. GFAP levels were significantly increased in migraine patients (median 103.15 pg/mL [IQR 70.98-146.34] vs. 69.43 pg/mL [IQR 53.04-91.85], p < 0.001), particularly in those with medication overuse (106.08 [IQR 87.94-159.07] vs. 71.38 [IQR 54.16-135.06], p = 0.007), without difference between EM and CM (p = 0.985). Although NfL levels were not increased (p = 0.387), they were higher in patients with a long migraine course (rho 0.519, p < 0.001). Attack at sampling/days from last attack, migraine frequency/attack severity did not influence NfL or GFAP levels. Our findings demonstrate the occurrence of glial damage, particularly correlated with medication overuse, and the presence of axonal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free