Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of dostarlimab in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and allergic diathesis: case report

Katia Lanzafame, Giusi Blanco, M. D'Asta, Mirella Sapienza, Giulia Maria Bonanno, C. Ettore, E. Giurato, Sabrina Paratore et al.

AME Case Reports, 2023

Abstract

Background Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) drugs in patients suffering from deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI) endometrial cancer (EC). The phase III Ruby study, showed benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with stage III–IV EC, both MSI-high/dMMR (MSI-H/dMMR) and mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS), treated upfront with chemotherapy in combination with dostarlimab. Even earlier, the GARNET trial, which enrolled patients with advanced or relapsed EC with dMMR and/or MSI progressing on prior platinum therapy to receive dostarlimab, reported overall response rate (ORR) of 43.5% with a manageable safety profile. We report on the case of an elderly patient with many pathologies treated with dostarlimab. Case Description A 75-year-old woman with EC (MSI-H) with pulmonary and bone metastasis progressed on first line chemotherapy platinum-containing, was treated with dostarlimab as monotherapy. Medical history was positive for arterial hypertension, autoimmune thrombocytopenia and allergy to amoxicillin and levofloxacin. After the second administration of dostarlimab, our patient showed a dramatic improvement of her clinical conditions. The clinical response was confirmed by radiological response on the basis of the results of a computed tomography (CT) scan performed in March 2023 that showed a reduction of the pelvic mass and pulmonary secondaries. No…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free