Evidence Hub

Eptinezumab to prevent difficult-to-treat migraine: prospective, six-month, real-world multicenter evidence from the GRASP study group

Dermitzakis EV, Argyriou AA, Chondrogianni M, Foska A, Rikos D, Athanasopoulos D, Tsironis C, Soldatos P et al.

The journal of headache and pain, 2026

142 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this multicenter, real-world study, designed by the Greek Research Alliance for the Study of headache and Pain (GRASP), was to prospectively evaluate the 6-month effectiveness and safety of eptinezumab 100 mg for migraine prophylaxis in difficult-to-treat patients. METHODS: A total of 142 participants (81% female; aged 46.1 ± 12.2 years) with either high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) were consecutively recruited and received eptinezumab 100 mg quarterly for 6 months (2 cycles). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved > 50% response at month 3 (T1) and 6 (T2), post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included the changes in monthly migraine/headache days (MMDs/MHDs); monthly days with moderate/severe peak headache intensity; monthly acute medication intake; MIDAS HIT-6 and EQ-5D VAS scores at T2, compared with baseline. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: The percentage of patients obtaining > 50% reduction in MMDs was 67.4% at T1 (first course) and 73.5% at T2 (second course) for HFEM. For CM the corresponding percentages were 55.9% at T1 and 57.6% at T2. At T2, MMDs were reduced with a significant effect by a median of 9 days from baseline in HFEM, whereas MHDs dropped by a median of 16.5 days in CM patients. A clinically-meaningful improvement in all other effectiveness and disability outcomes was observed at T2, compared to baseline. Quality of life improved by + 87.5% in HFEM and by + 133.3% in CM…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 142 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free