Evidence Hub

Validation of a Portuguese version of the four-item Migraine Interictal Burden Scale

Ferrão Malheiro S, Dourado Sotero F, Pereira MB, Nunes Vicente B, Franco RLM, Duardte Rodrigues Casanosa S, Ramos Ferreira JM, Santos Gil Gouveia R et al.

Headache, 2025

459 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Migraine is the most common neurological disorder and the second leading cause of disability. While the impact of migraine on daily life is often assessed by the frequency and intensity of attacks, the impairment between episodes is frequently overlooked. The four-item Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4) is a tool that can provide information and help in the evaluation of interictal disability.

OBJECTIVE: To adapt and validate a translated version of the MIBS-4 for the Portuguese population.

METHODS: A prospective, multicentric observational study was conducted between July 2023 and February 2024 in six tertiary headache centers across Portugal. The MIBS-4 was translated and back-translated to obtain a consensus version. The scale was administered to 459 patients with migraine, and its psychometric properties were assessed through correlations with established measures, including the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

RESULTS: A total of 459 patients were evaluated, including 430 women (93.7%), with an average age of 45.06 years. The MIBS-4 demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.81-0.86) and significant correlations with the MIDAS (r = 0.304, p < 0.001), SF-12 (r = 0.483, p < 0.001), and HADS (r = 0.211, p < 0.001), confirming its reliability and construct validity.

CONCLUSION: This analysis showed that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 459 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free