Evidence Hub

Treatment effectiveness of galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications at 3 months: Results from the TRIUMPH study

Lipton RB, Láinez MJA, Ahmed Z, Vallarino C, Novick D, Vincent M, Viktrup L, Robinson RL

Headache, 2026

2,813 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the 3-month effectiveness of the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the effectiveness of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications are limited. However, such comparisons in real-world settings are useful for decision-making by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

METHODS: TRIUMPH is an ongoing, international, prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with migraine, initiating or switching to new preventive medication with a focus on galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications. Data for this analysis were collected from February 25, 2020, through February 9, 2023. All treatment decisions were at the physicians' discretion. The primary outcome was a 3-month response based on reductions in physician-recorded monthly migraine headache days: ≥50% (episodic migraine) or ≥30% (chronic migraine). The difference in the proportion of responders between treatments was assessed after adjusting for baseline cohort differences.

RESULTS: Of 2813 patients, 1105 received galcanezumab and 1293 received traditional oral migraine preventive medications. The weighted response rate at 3 months was greater with galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications (46.6% vs. 34.5%; p < 0.001). Additional 3-month mean…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,813 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free