Evidence Hub

Retrospective cohort study of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody unresponsive migraine individuals treated with atogepant: The RESCUE study

Alex Jaimes, J. Rodríguez-Vico, O. Pajares, Ignacio Eguilior Caffarena, Anna Lena Nystrom Hernández, Andrea Gómez, J. Porta-Etessam

Cephalalgia, 2025

44 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Background A subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) does not respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), even after switching agents. Although atogepant is effective in EM and CM, its role in individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs remains to be elucidated. We hypothesize that atogepant may be a viable preventive option in these cases. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in EM and CM individuals who discontinued anti-CGRP mAbs due to lack or loss of efficacy and were subsequently treated with atogepant. The primary endpoint was the ≥50% response rate in monthly headache days (MHDs). Secondary outcomes included ≥30% and ≥75% response rates in MHDs, response rates in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (MSHDs), and changes in MHDs, MSHDs, acute medication days (AMDs) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Patient Global Impression (PGI) scores and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results Of 213 screened records, 44 participants met inclusion criteria; 39 (88.6%) were female and 39 (88.6%) had CM. Prior use of anti-CGRP mAbs included erenumab in 11.4% of participants, galcanezumab in 52.3% and fremanezumab in 86.3%. After three months, 18.2% achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHDs; ≥30% and ≥75% response rates were 25.0% and 6.8% respectively. For MSHDs, ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 47.6%, 33.3% and 19.0%, respectively. Median MHDs decreased from 24.5 (interquartile range…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free