Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir, tenofovir and lamivudine during venous–venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV‐ECMO): A case report

Tom C. Zwart, E. Leegwater, T. Ottens, Emile F Schippers, E. Wilms, D. Burger, C. van Nieuwkoop, L. Bosma

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2026

Abstract

While providing potentially life‐saving cardiorespiratory support for critically ill patients, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may detrimentally affect pharmacokinetic (PK) performance and concurrent drug efficacy and safety. We describe a patient with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in the context of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) who received dolutegravir, tenofovir and lamivudine while undergoing venous–venous (VV‐) ECMO. Initial therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during VV‐ECMO revealed 9.6‐fold lower dolutegravir, 1.5‐fold lower tenofovir and 1.7‐fold higher lamivudine exposure as compared to reference populations. Our findings support considerations for pre‐emptive dose intensification for dolutegravir and tenofovir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS undergoing ECMO to ensure adequate antiretroviral treatment. The case is illustrative for the clinical pharmacological challenges faced in critically ill patients with HIV/AIDS undergoing ECMO and provides guidance for future cases.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free