Evidence Hub

Comparative effectiveness of weekly versus biweekly combined greater and supraorbital nerve blocks in chronic migraine: A retrospective observational cohort study

Ç. Aktan, Gözde Çelik

Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2025

52 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Greater occipital nerve (GON) and supraorbital nerve (SON) blocks are effective interventional options for chronic migraine treatment; however, the optimal frequency of injections remains undefined. This study aims to compare the short-term efficacy of weekly and biweekly GON and SON blocks in patients with chronic migraine (CM). The focus will be on pain intensity, monthly headache days (MHD), analgesic consumption and migraine-related disability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included adults meeting The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria for chronic migraine who received either weekly (n = 45) or biweekly (n = 52) standardized bilateral GON and SON blocks. The primary outcome was the change in MHD; secondary outcomes were The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, monthly analgesic consumption, The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores, responder rates, and adverse events. Within-group changes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction, and between-group comparisons with the Mann-Whitney U or chi-square test. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (all p > 0.05). Both protocols produced significant improvements in VAS, MHD, analgesic use, and MIDAS scores from baseline to 3 months (all p 0.17), and between-group effect sizes were small (|d| < 0.15).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 52 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free