Evidence Hub

Association between seasons with substantial atmospheric pressure change and migraine occurrence: a retrospective cohort study using Japanese claims data and meteorological data

M. Tatsumoto, Koichi Hirata, Takeo Nakayama, Kentaro Yamato, Norihiro Nakamichi, Lyo Inuyama

Frontiers in Neurology, 2025

26,777 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background This study investigated the impact of seasons with substantial atmospheric pressure change on the occurrence of migraine using large-scale data from a Japanese health insurance claims database matched with meteorological data. Methods This retrospective cohort study used JMDC Claims Data and national meteorological data from Japan. Patients with a diagnostic record of migraine were included and categorized into eight regional subgroups based on the location of the healthcare facility at which they were initially diagnosed with migraine. The time to migraine occurrence, defined as the duration from the first day of each season to the prescription of triptans, was compared between the seasons with the highest and lowest atmospheric pressure change. Results A total of 26,777 individuals were included in this study. Summer showed the lowest atmospheric pressure change across all eight regions. Conversely, winter showed the highest atmospheric pressure change in seven regions, while autumn showed the highest change in one region. No differences were observed in survival curves between the seasons with the highest and lowest atmospheric pressure change in any region. In Cox regression analysis, hazard ratio for the season with the highest atmospheric pressure change was 0.970 (95% CI: 0.951–0.989) in the minimally adjusted model, which included sex and age. Conversely, the fully adjusted model, which incorporated eight covariates, indicated a hazard ratio of 1.294 (95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 26,777 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free