Evidence Hub

The cost of migraine to the NHS in England: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)

Shuk-Li Collings, Amisha Patel, Hannah Gowman, Sarah Law, Aideen Ahern, Robert Pawinski, R. Wood, Shazia K. Afridi

Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2025

47,376 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To quantify healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated direct medical costs of migraine among adults in England compared with general population controls. Methods This retrospective cohort study used linked primary and secondary healthcare data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum [CPRD] and Hospital Episode Statistics [HES]) in England. Migraine cases (adults newly diagnosed with migraine between 1-Jan-2017 and 31-Mar-2019) and general population controls were matched on age, sex, ethnicity, practice region, Index of Multiple Deprivation 2019, and baseline depression and cardiovascular disease. All-cause HCRU and costs were estimated for cases and compared with controls using Fisher’s Exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. Subgroup analyses were conducted by migraine treatment group (acute only, preventative only, acute and preventative, no treatment). Results A total of 62,143 migraine cases and matched controls were identified, of which 76.2% (n = 47,376) were female and the mean [SD] age at index was 39.8 [15.5] years. All-cause direct medical costs per-person per-year (pppy) were approximately 81% greater (p < 0.0001) in those with migraine (median [Q1, Q3]: £492 [£205, £1,149]) than controls (£272 [£101, £716]). The acute and preventative treatment subgroup had the highest all-cause direct costs pppy (£925 [£430, £2,046]). Conclusion Overall, patients diagnosed with migraine contribute a substantially larger cost burden on the healthcare…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 47,376 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free