Evidence Hub

The use of triptans and other acute treatments for the management of migraine in routine clinical practice in England: a retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

Shuk-Li Collings, Amisha Patel, Hannah Gowman, Sarah Law, Aideen Ahern, Robert Pawinski, R. Wood, Shazia K. Afridi

BMC Primary Care, 2025

62,205 participants

Abstract

Migraine is a common and disabling neurological condition affecting around 10 million people in the UK. Optimal management has been indicated as a priority for improving migraine care in the UK, supported by clinical guidelines to provide clinicians with pathways for using acute and preventative treatments. There is a paucity of evidence on the real-world management of migraine, particularly with acute treatments. A retrospective cohort study using linked primary and secondary healthcare data in England (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD] Aurum and Hospital Episode Statistics [HES]). Adults with their first diagnosis of migraine between 1st January 2017 and 31st March 2019 were identified. Acute treatment patterns (prescribing rates, sequencing) and triptan use were described during a variable 12-month minimum follow-up period, up to 31st March 2020. A total of 62,205 patients met all eligibility criteria, of which 76.2% (n = 47,420) were female and the mean (SD) age at index was 39.8 (15.5) years. Almost 60% (n = 36,849; 59.2%) of the cohort received no prescription for acute treatment during follow-up, 23.1% (n = 14, 379) received acute treatment only and 17.6% (n = 10,977) received acute and preventative treatments. Triptans (25.7%; n = 15,971) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (15.1%; n = 9,368) were the most frequently prescribed acute treatments during follow-up. Opioids were prescribed to 28.5% (n = 3,130) of the acute and preventative subgroup, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 62,205 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free