Evidence Hub

Migraine May Represent an Independent Risk Factor for Retinal Stroke: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Jay B. Lusk, Ai-Lin Song, Shakthi Unnithan, Hussein Al-Khalidi, Adam de Havenon, V. Biousse, Matthew Schrag, E. Solopova et al.

Clinical neurology and neurosurgery (Dutch-Flemish ed. Print), 2024

2 citations

Abstract

Introduction Migraine is an established risk factor for cerebral ischemic stroke, with an especially robust association in patients with migraine with aura. However, it is not known if migraine is a risk factor for retinal stroke (central or branch retinal artery occlusion; CRAO or BRAO). Methods We performed a retrospective, observational, cohort study using population-based data from the State Inpatient Databases and State Emergency Department Databases from New York (2006–2015), California (2003–2011), and Florida (2006–2015) to determine the association between hospital-documented migraine and retinal stroke. The primary exposure was hospital-documented migraine (ascertained from admission or emergency department diagnosis codes). The primary endpoint was time to hospital-documented CRAO (ICD-9-CM code 362.31 in the primary diagnosis position) and secondary endpoints included time to BRAO and any retinal artery occlusion (RAO). Cause-specific hazard models were used to model the association between migraine and subsequent CRAO. Results Of 39,835,024 patients included in the study, 1,109,140 had migraine documented during our two year ascertainment window. Patients with migraine were younger (40.2±15.2 vs. 46.9±19.8, standardized difference (SD) 0.38), more likely to be female (81.4% vs. 54.7%, SD 0.6), and had a lower burden of atrial fibrillation (4.5% vs. 6.9%, SD 0.1), chronic kidney disease (1.9% vs. 3.6%, SD 0.2), and congestive cardiac failure (2.7% vs. 5.1%, SD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free