Evidence Hub

Association Between Migraine and Open Angle Glaucoma: A 12-Year Nationwide Retrospective Korean Cohort Study

H. Kim, Jun-soo Ro, Seung-Hoon Lee, Jong Youn Moon, Si Hyung Lee

Journal of glaucoma, 2024

1,103,302 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Précis: Patients with migraine showed a significantly increased risk of developing open angle glaucoma (OAG) in the Korean population, without significant differences according to the presence of aura. Our results suggest the presence of migraine as a possible risk factor for OAG. Purpose: Previous studies have reported that migraine headaches may be one of the possible risk factors for open angle glaucoma (OAG); however, a consensus has not been reached regarding the association between OAG and migraine. In this study, we examined the risk of developing OAG in migraine patients using a 12-year nationwide cohort. Materials and Methods: In this study, data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database from 2002 to 2015 was used to perform a retrospective cohort study. The study included 1,103,302 subjects, out of which 41,148 were diagnosed with migraine during 2003–2008 and were categorized as the migraine group, while 205,741 patients were selected as controls through propensity score matching at a 1:5 ratio. Subjects with migraine or OAG was ascertained based on the KCD code. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the hazard rate of OAG onset in the migraine group, and subgroup analysis was performed to identify any differences based on sex and age. Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the incidence of OAG was significantly greater among patients with migraine than among patients in the comparison…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,103,302 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free