Evidence Hub

Migraine Risk in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea

Ye-On-Hak Chung, Kyung-do Han, J. Jung, Soonwook Kwon, Eun Bin Cho, Junhee Park, Dong Wook Shin, Ju-Hong Min

Neuroepidemiology, 2024

1,551 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Although the relationship between migraine and multiple sclerosis (MS) has been reported, the risk of migraine in MS and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the risk of migraine in the Korean MS and NMOSD populations. Methods: This study analyzed claims data from 1,492 patients with MS and 1,551 patients with NMOSD based on diagnostic codes in the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Migraine risk was compared with a control group (matched 1:5 for age, sex, and comorbidities) using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patients aged <20 years and with previous migraine were excluded. Results: Migraine risk was higher in patients with MS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15−1.62) but did not differ significantly in patients with NMOSD (aHR 1.05; 95% CI: 0.87−1.27) compared to controls. No significant sex-based differences in migraine risk were observed. Patients with NMOSD showed decreasing risk with age (p for interaction = 0.040). Comorbidities like hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia did not significantly alter migraine risk in either group. Conclusion: The study results revealed an increased risk of migraines in patients with MS but not in patients with NMSOD compared with matched controls.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,551 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free