Evidence Hub

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Migraine: A Retrospective, Observational, Cohort Study

Jay B. Lusk, Lauren E Wilson, Carlene Moore, Stephanie Yarnell, Cheryl Kalapura, A. Choudhury, Matthew Schrag, S. Poli et al.

Neurology, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors have entered widespread use in the United States (US) for treatment of migraine but data on their cardiovascular risk profile are lacking. The objective of this study was to determine whether exposure to a CGRP inhibitor is associated with cardiovascular events in patients with migraine. Methods: Retrospective, observational, cohort study using computerized claims data from a proprietary, insurance-based registry – Marketscan (by Merative). Beneficiaries with at least one claim related to a migraine diagnosis and continuous coverage for at least 12 months prior to migraine diagnosis were included. Using a sequential trial framework, the rate of cardiovascular events was computed in those who did and did not initiate a CGRP inhibitor, using both crude estimates and those derived in propensity score-overlap weighted cohorts. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. The principal exposure was initiation of any CGRP inhibitor. The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, cerebral ischemic stroke, revascularization, peripheral arterial disease, or central retinal artery occlusion. Secondary end points included each component individually. A falsification end point (humeral fracture) was included. Results: In total, 900,370 beneficiaries (median age 41 [Q1, Q3: 31, 51]; 77.8% female) were included of whom 58,679 initiated a CGRP inhibitor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free