Evidence Hub

Triptan Initiation and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients With Migraine: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Kalapura C, Lusk JB, Wilson LE, Moore C, Yarnell S, Choudhury A, Schrag M, Poli S et al.

Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026

869 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Triptan medications are proposed as an association of cerebral ischemic stroke in patients with migraine, but population-based data on this are lacking.

METHODS: A retrospective, observational, cohort study was performed using computerized claims data from a proprietary, insurance-based registry-Marketscan (by Merative). Patients with at least 1 claim related to a migraine diagnosis were included. The primary exposure was initiation of any triptan medication defined by at least 1 prescription fill. The primary end point was time to cerebral ischemic stroke. Secondary end points included time to retinal stroke (central retinal artery occlusion, other retinal artery occlusion), intracranial hemorrhage, and myocardial infarction. The association between triptan initiation and study end points was modeled using a propensity score-overlap weighted Cox model. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% CIs were computed.

RESULTS: In total, 869 092 patients (median age 40.0 years [Q1-Q3, 30.0-50.0]; 77.5% female) met study selection criteria of whom 287 629 initiated a triptan and 581 463 did not. Median follow-up was 2555 days in the entire cohort. Initiation of a triptan was associated with higher hazard of cerebral ischemic stroke (adjusted HR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.65-3.51]; absolute risk difference of 0.17% per year). Of 4 secondary end points, 2 were associated with triptan use: intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted HR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.65-3.41]) and myocardial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 869 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free