Evidence Hub

Hypoperfusion of Amygdala in Chronic Migraine: An Exploratory Quantitative Perfusion Imaging Using 3D Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling

Jiang Y, Li X, Zhao S, Liu M, Chen Z

Current medical imaging, 2024

13 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the amygdala has structural and functional abnormalities in Chronic Migraine (CM), less is known about the altered perfusion of the amygdala in CM.

OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to assess amygdala perfusion in CM using a contrast agent-free and quantitative approach.

METHODS: 15 Normal Controls (NC) and 13 patients with CM during the migraine interval were assessed for brain structure and subjected to 3D Pseudo- Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling (3D-PCASL) MR imaging. The Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) value of the amygdala was automatically extracted based on the individual amygdala mask for all participants. The independent sample t-test, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and correlation analysis were used to evaluate the perfusion changes in CM.

RESULTS: Bilateral amygdala cerebral perfusion was lower in CM (left amygdala, 42.21±4.49 ml/100mg/min; right amygdala, 42.38±4.41 ml/100mg/min) than in NC (left amygdala, 48.31±6.92 ml/100mg/min; right amygdala, 47.88±6.53 ml/100mg/min) (left, p = 0.01; right, p = 0.02). There was no significant correlation between the perfusion of bilateral amygdalas and the clinical variables. Also, there was no significant difference in the volume of bilateral amygdalas between the two groups. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the CBF values of the left and right amygdala was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.58-0.91) and 0.75 (95%CI: 0.55-0.89), respectively. The cut-off value was 44.24 ml/100mg/min (left amygdala, with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free