Evidence Hub

Conjunctival bacterial flora and antimicrobial susceptibility in bacterial pathogens isolated prior to cataract surgery

Matsuura K, Miyazaki D, Sasaki SI, Inoue Y, Sasaki Y, Shimizu Y

Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2020

108 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To optimize prophylactic antibiotic administration, antibiotic susceptibility before cataract surgery was investigated using ocular bacteria isolated preoperatively.

DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS: In 204 eyes of 102 patients who underwent routine bilateral cataract surgery, conjunctival sac scrapings were collected 1-2 weeks before surgery. A total of 192 major pathogens among the 470 isolated bacteria were subjected to susceptibility testing. The major pathogens included Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) other than S. epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus spp. The following antibiotics were tested: cefmenoxime (CMX), ceftazidime (CAZ), tobramycin (TOB), vancomycin (VAN), erythromycin (EM), moxifloxacin (MFLX), gatifloxacin (GFLX), levofloxacin (LVFX), chloramphenicol (CP), and imipenem (IP).

RESULTS: The proportions of isolates with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of S. epidermidis (N = 82), exceeding 4 μg/ml were high for CAZ (95.1%), EM (32.9%), LVFX (39.0%), and CP (82.9%). Susceptible (S) proportion was high for CMX (98.8%), VAN (100%), CP (93.9%), and IP (97.6%) but relatively low for MFLX (59.8%), GFLX (54.9%), and LVFX (54.9%). The MIC90 values were high for CMX (16 μg/ml), CAZ (64 μg/ml), TOB (32 μg/ml), EM (128 μg/ml), LVFX (16 μg/ml), and CP (8 μg/ml). The MIC of quinolonesof pathogenic bacteria other than S.epidermidis (N = 108), exceeded 4 μg/ml for 11…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 108 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free