Evidence Hub

Impaired bone status in high frequency episodic or chronic migraine women: A case-control study with blood and densitometric parameters

Marina Haro, María Muñoz-San Martín, G. Gárate, Lucia De La Guerra, V. González-Quintanilla, J. Madera, S. Pérez-Pereda, C. Valero et al.

Cephalalgia, 2026

108 participants

Abstract

Background/Aim Migraine and osteoporosis are highly prevalent in women and represent a substantial socio-health burden. We aimed to comprehensively assess bone status in women with frequent migraine. Patients and Methods Adult women with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) were recruited and compared with age- and body mass index–matched female controls. Serum parameters of bone metabolism, including 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH), as well as bone turnover markers (procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide [P1NP] and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTX]), were measured. Bone mineral density (BMD), T-scores and trabecular bone score (TBS) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results A total of 108 women with CM/HFEM and 129 matched controls were included. Compared with controls, women with migraine had lower serum 25(OH)D and calcium levels (p ≤ 0.001) and higher adjusted CTX levels (p = 0.039). Densitometric assessment revealed significantly reduction in BMD at femoral neck (g/cm2 and T-score) and total hip (T-score) in the migraine group (p < 0.001). Lumbar TBS was also lower in CM/HFEM patients (p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, TBS remained independently associated with migraine status. These alterations remained in women with HFEM and in those younger than 50 years, and were associated with reduced physical activity and sun exposure. Conclusions Women with frequent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 108 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free