Evidence Hub

Three-month treatment with monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway is associated with multi-domain improvement of sensory processing and cortical network efficiency: results from a prospective case-control study

L. Klehr, A. Thiele, M. Bendig, C. Kloetzer, T. Herr, N. Armagan, S. Strauss, R. Fleischmann

medRxiv, 2025

22 participants

Abstract

Background/Hypothesis: Monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP mAbs) are effective drugs for migraine prevention. Worsening of symptoms following their discontinuation challenges their consideration as disease-modifying migraine drugs (DMMD). This study investigates whether changes in sensory processing and cortical network efficiency under CGRP mAb treatment. Methods: 22 patients suffering episodic migraine (21 female, 46.2+/-13.8 years) and 22 age-/gender-matched controls received visual and somatosensory evoked potentials (VEPs, SSEPs) assessments, and quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). Patients were investigated before (V0),after three months (V3), and headache characteristics additionally followed-up at 6 and 12 months, of treatment with CGRP mAbs. Controls were assessed only once. Results: Facilitation of VEP at V0 in patients shifted to habituation at V3 following treatment with CGRP mAbs ({Delta}slope: -0.37+/-0.83, p=0.03). VEP habituation at V3 did not differ from controls. SSEPs were equally attenuated in patients and controls throughout the study. QEEG parameters in patients indicated impaired network efficiency at V0 that normalized at V3, and were unlike evoked potential studies correlated with six and twelve month outcomes. Conclusion/ Interpretation: Improved cortical network efficiency and sensory processing suggests disease-modifying effects of CGRP mAbs with delayed clinical effects on headache. Relapse after…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free