Evidence Hub

Differences in cortical morphometry between persistent post-traumatic headache, migraine and healthy controls

Christensen RH, Al-Khazali HM, Ashina M, Vashchenko N, Dominguez-Moreno R, Tolnai D, Ashina H

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2025

103 participants

Abstract

BackgroundPersistent post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a prevalent and disabling neurological disorder, often attributed to mild traumatic brain injury and resembling migraine in clinical features. The underlying cortical morphometric changes and their relevance to persistent PTH remain unclear.MethodsThis cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigation enrolled 103 adults with persistent PTH, 296 with migraine and 155 healthy controls (HC), to undergo structural MRI at 3T. Cortical surface area, thickness and volume were evaluated in FreeSurfer. The analyses applied cluster-determining thresholds of p < 0.001 and cluster-wise thresholds of p < 0.05, adjusted for age, sex and total intracranial volume.ResultsParticipants with persistent PTH exhibited larger surface area in the right anterior and posterior cingulate cortex (pcluster = 0.003), as well as the right superior parietal cortex/postcentral gyrus, compared to HC (pcluster < 0.035). No morphometric differences were observed between participants with persistent PTH and migraine (including subgroups: episodic, chronic, with aura without aura).ConclusionsThese findings reveal morphometric alterations in persistent PTH, specifically within pain processing regions of the mid-cingulate and somatosensory cortex. Similar changes have been reported in migraine, suggesting a shared neurobiological substrate. These enlargements might reflect adaptations to recurrent nociceptive stimuli that sustain persistent PTH.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 103 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free