Evidence Hub

Driving after Concussion: Symptom Clusters and Neurocognition Uniquely Relate to Post-concussion Driving Performance

Hashida K, Drattell J, Devos H, Gore R, Lynall R, Schmidt J

Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2025

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify clinical concussion assessment outcomes that uniquely capture simulated driving performance among acutely concussed individuals, relative to controls.

METHODS: Cross-sectional design. Twenty-eight college students within 72 hours of concussion and 46 non-concussed controls participated in the study. We collected the following clinical concussion assessment outcomes: four concussion symptom clusters, seven computerized neurocognitive domain scores, Standardized Assessment of Concussion total score, Balance Error Scoring System total score, and tandem gait completion time. The following simulated driving outcomes were included (count): total collisions, speed exceedances, centerline crossings, and road edge excursions. We used separate generalized linear mixed regression models fit using a Poisson distribution with group, assessment, and interaction effects.

RESULTS: Higher migrainous symptoms ( P < 0.001), cognitive-fatigue symptoms ( P = 0.041), poorer visual memory ( P = 0.015), and slower reaction time ( P = 0.023) in concussion group were associated with higher risk of committing speed exceedances, relative to controls. Conversely, better performance on the continuous performance test ( P = 0.046) and Standardized Assessment of Concussion ( P = 0.045) in concussion group was associated with higher risk of committing speed exceedances relative to controls. Poorer performance on psychomotor speed ( P = 0.001), reaction time ( P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free