Evidence Hub

Migraine and brain structure in the elderly: The Rotterdam Study

Acarsoy C, Ikram MK, Ikram MA, Vernooij MW, Bos D

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2024

4,920 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggested that persons with migraine might be at higher risk of structural brain changes, including cerebral small vessel disease and atrophy. However, findings in the literature are inconsistent, with variations observed in the direction, magnitude, and population characteristics of reported effects, and large-scale population-based evidence remains scarce. Hence, we investigated the association of migraine with structural brain changes in a middle-aged and elderly population.

METHODS: Within the population-based Rotterdam Study, lifetime history of migraine was assessed using a validated questionnaire between 2006 and 2011. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was performed in 4920 participants (median age 61.7 [IQR 45.5, 97.5] years, 55.4% female) to assess imaging markers of cerebral small vessel disease and brain atrophy. We used linear and logistic regression models to examine the cross-sectional association of migraine with brain volumes (total grey and white matter volumes in mL) and cerebral small vessel disease markers (white matter hyperintensity volume in mL, presence of lacunes and cerebral microbleeds). Adjustments were made for age, sex, intracranial volume and cardiovascular variables. Analyses were also stratified by sex and presence of aura.

RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of migraine was 15.3% (752/4920). In multivariable adjusted regression models, we found no statistically significant differences between participants with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 4,920 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free