Evidence Hub

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: An appraisal of the 2023 ACR/CHEST guideline

Alene A. Saavedra, Kevin T. Mueller, E. Kowalski, G. Qian, Katarina J. Bade, K. Vanni, Gregory C. McDermott, Jeffrey A. Sparks

Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology, 2024

217 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

To summarize the current treatment landscape of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) in the context of the recent 2023 American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians guideline for ILD treatment in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The guideline conditionally recommends mycophenolate, azathioprine, and rituximab for first-line RA-ILD therapy, with cyclophosphamide and short-term glucocorticoids as additional options. For RA-ILD progression after first line, mycophenolate, rituximab, nintedanib, tocilizumab, cyclophosphamide, and pirfenidone are conditionally recommended, while long-term glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended against. Only three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolled patients with RA-ILD (total n = 217). All other recommendations for RA-ILD were based on RCTs for other diseases or observational data. Antifibrotics might be particularly effective for patients with RA-ILD and the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (RA-UIP). There is uncertainty of the utility of azathioprine and glucocorticoids in RA-UIP since these medications had worse outcomes compared to placebo in an RCT of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. RA-ILD treatment decisions should consider articular activity, ILD activity, comorbidities, and potential for infection. We summarized the current treatment landscape for RA-ILD. Since only three RCTs included patients with RA-ILD, most guideline recommendations were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 217 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free