Evidence Hub

Patient Satisfaction with Aesthetic Outcomes Following OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Chronic Migraine: A Cross-Sectional Study

Magdalena Boczarska-Jedynak, Marta Bott-Karoń, Karol Marschollek, Mariola Antolak, M. Świat, M. Waliszewska-Prosół

Toxins, 2025

124 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnaBoNT-A) is approved for chronic migraine prevention and follows the PREEMPT protocol with injections in the glabellar and forehead regions. While aesthetic changes are considered a side effect, their effect on patient satisfaction has not been thoroughly assessed. This study evaluated patient satisfaction with facial aesthetic outcomes after repeated OnaBoNT-A treatment for chronic migraine. Conducted at specialist headache centers, it included adult patients with chronic migraine who had received at least three OnaBoNT-A cycles. Participants completed a structured questionnaire on demographics, migraine history, facial wrinkles and age perception, appearance satisfaction, psychological impact, treatment satisfaction, and adverse aesthetic events. A total of 124 patients (92.7% female; median age 42.5 years) participated. OnaBoNT-A reduced wrinkle severity (p < 0.0001). Most patients (74.2%) reported aesthetic improvement post-treatment. The majority of patients (76.7%) declared that treatment met or exceeded expectations. 32% reported looking younger post-treatment, with a median perceived age difference of 5 years. Adverse event frequency was similar to pivotal trial outcomes, mostly mild, with no treatment discontinuations. OnaBoNT-A for chronic migraine, following the PREEMPT protocol, provides significant therapeutic benefits and high patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcomes. Although aesthetic side effects were generally mild, they were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 124 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free