Evidence Hub

Feasibility and safety of vertebrobasilar artery cooling infusion (VACI) following thrombectomy for acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Zhe Cheng, Yu-Chuan Ding, Gary B. Rajah, Jie Gao, Fenghai Li, Lin-Lin Ma, Jing Liu, X. Geng

Neurotherapeutics, 2026

Abstract

Not all patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT), particularly in the posterior circulation. This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of vertebrobasilar artery cooling infusion (VACI) administered after successful recanalization as a neuroprotective strategy for posterior circulation AIS. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to VACI or control. The VACI group received 300 mL of 4 °C saline infused into the vertebral artery at 30 mL/min after thrombectomy, whereas controls received 300 mL of 37 °C saline. All patients received standard guideline-based care. The primary endpoint was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary endpoints included functional outcomes, infarct volume, mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), vasospasm, coagulation abnormalities, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection. VACI following EVT appears safe and feasible in posterior circulation AIS and may offer potential neuroprotective benefit. Forty patients were enrolled and analyzed. The incidence of sICH did not differ between groups. Rates of neurological deterioration and other complications were comparable. Favorable trends were observed in the VACI group, including improved early neurological recovery (median NIHSS 6 vs. 12.5) and smaller final infarct volume (9.0 vs. 17.5 mL). Mortality was numerically lower in the VACI group at 90 days (10.0% vs. 20.0%) and at 7 days (5.0% vs.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free