Clinical outcome and genomic biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for cancer of unknown primary: a multicenter, real-world study
Abstract
Given the limited treatment options recommended for cancer of unknown primary (CUP), especially the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs and identify associated genomic biomarkers in these patients. This retrospective, multicenter, real-world analysis included individuals with oncologist-confirmed CUP cases treated with ICIs across four hospitals in China. Clinical outcomes, safety and biomarkers were analyzed. Between January 2016 and November 2023, 124 patients were enrolled. Of these, 117 patients underwent combination therapy, predominantly ICIs with taxane-platinum based chemotherapy (54.84%), while 7 received monotherapy. After a median follow-up of 18.6 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 23.20 and 38.86 months, respectively. According to ESMO guideline, patients were stratified into favorable (n = 41) and unfavorable subset (n = 83). The favorable subset demonstrated significantly longer PFS and OS than the unfavorable subset (median PFS NR vs. 9.7 months, P 12 mutations/Mb). Multivariate analyses revealed that higher ECOG performance status, the presence of visceral metastasis, and KRAS mutation were independently associated with inferior PFS and OS. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 49 (39.52%) patients, with one developing grade 3 pneumonia. The application of ICIs showed encouraging efficacy with an acceptable safety profile, suggesting its potential as…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 117 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Penicillins for Treatment of Pneumococcal Pneumonia: Does In Vitro Resistance Really Matter?
- Thiophenes—Naturally Occurring Plant Metabolites: Biological Activities and In Silico Evaluation of Their Potential as Cathepsin D Inhibitors
- Inhalable Mannosylated Rifampicin–Curcumin Co-Loaded Nanomicelles with Enhanced In Vitro Antimicrobial Efficacy for an Optimized Pulmonary Tuberculosis Therapy
- Development and validation of microbial bioassay for quantification of Levofloxacin in pharmaceutical preparations
- GC-MS Analysis and Biomedical Therapy of Oil from n-Hexane Fraction of Scutellaria edelbergii Rech. f.: In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico Approach
- Propranolol, chlorpromazine and diclofenac restore susceptibility of extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-Acinetobacter baumannii to fluoroquinolones
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.