Evidence Hub

Reliable Change Indices for the Serial Administration of the Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening Tool

Durfee KJ, Schatz P, Kontos AP, Collins MW, Womble MN, Jennings S, Ceola MF, Elbin RJ

Journal of athletic training, 2024

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening Tool (CP Screen) self-report concussion symptom inventory is often administered at weekly intervals. However, 1-week reliable change indices (RCIs) for clinical cutoffs and the test-retest reliability of the CP Screen are unknown.

OBJECTIVE: To document RCI cutoff scores and 1-week test-retest reliability for each profile and modifier of the CP Screen for men and women.

DESIGN: Case series.

SETTING: A large US university.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-three healthy college students.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants completed 2 administrations of the CP Screen 7 days apart. The CP Screen items yielded 5 clinical profiles and 2 modifiers. Spearman ρ coefficients (rs), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), single measures, and unbiased estimates of reliability (UERs) were used to assess test-retest reliability. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests assessed differences across time. Reliable change index values and cutoff scores are provided at 90%/95% CIs. All analyses were performed for the total sample and separately for men and women.

RESULTS: Reliable change index cutoffs for clinically significant change (increase/decrease) at a 90% CI for men were as follows: ocular, vestibular >2/>4; anxiety/mood, cognitive/fatigue, and migraine >3/>3; sleep >4/>6; and neck >2/>2. Reliable change index cutoffs for clinically significant change (increase/decrease) at a 90% CI for women were as follows: anxiety/mood…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free