Evidence Hub

NCMP-37. Clinical patterns and long-term outcomes in stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy (SMART): a case series

Janet La, Lynne Taylor, J. Graber

Neuro-Oncology, 2025

6 participants

Abstract

Stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy (SMART) syndrome is a rare and underrecognized complication of prior cranial irradiation. It is characterized by recurrent migraine-like headaches temporally associated with neurological deficits, including visual disturbance, aphasia and weakness, and seizure activity. MRI brain classically demonstrates unilateral cortical gyriform or ribbon enhancement with corresponding T2/FLAIR changes in previously irradiated regions without clear diffusion restriction or susceptibility changes. MRI changes are transient and may not be found in every attack. Many patients experience clinical recovery with supportive care, accompanied by corresponding radiographic improvement. Recurrent episodes are common though the true incidence and frequency remain to be elucidated. The role of supportive therapy in preventing recurrences is also unclear. Corticosteroids, aspirin, calcium channel blockers and valproate have been suggested as supportive therapy based on a hypothesis of radiation-induced vascular dysfunction. We present a single-institution case series of 6 patients with long term observation of SMART syndrome, consisting of 4 women and 2 men, who received brain radiation between the ages of 12 and 59 for malignant gliomas (3), germ cell tumor (1), atypical meningioma (1) and choroid plexus carcinoma (1). They presented with abrupt onset of SMART syndrome with a range of 6 to 26 (mean 14.5) years after radiation. Recurrence of SMART…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 6 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free