Evidence Hub

PO-35 | Treatment of chronic and episodic migraine with atogepant improves quality of life in patients with comorbid multiple sclerosis: the experience of the Headache Center at Spaziani Hospital, Frosinone

Società Italiana per lo studio delle Cefalee (SISC)

Confinia cephalalgica (Milano), 2025

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a common comorbidity in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), often complicating clinical management due to overlapping symptoms, increased disability, and limited therapeutic options. Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine, has demonstrated efficacy in the general population. However, evidence regarding its use in patients with MS is currently lacking.

Methods: We present a case series involving three female patients with MS and comorbid migraine treated at the Headache Center of Spaziani Hospital. Two patients (ages 46 and 56) had Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) with Episodic Migraine, and one patient (age 38) had Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS) with Chronic Migraine. All were undergoing disease-modifying therapy (DMTs): Dimethyl fumarate, Natalizumab and Siponimod. Previous prophylactic migraine treatments were either poorly tolerated or ineffective. At baseline, all patients showed moderate to severe migraine-related disability (MIDAS scores) and mild to moderate neurological impairment (EDSS). Atogepant was initiated at 60 mg once daily.

Results: After 6 months of treatment, all three patients reported a significant reduction in monthly migraine days, with substantial improvement in MIDAS scores. The patient with Chronic Migraine transitioned to an episodic migraine profile. No adverse events or worsening of MS-related symptoms were observed during…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free