Evidence Hub

Bilateral subdural hygromas following dural puncture

McCarthy R, Burke D, Bruton J

BMJ case reports, 2025

Abstract

A parturient reported a headache 20 hours following unintentional dural puncture during epidural placement for labour analgesia. It was positional, mild to moderate in severity with no focal neurological signs. Six days later, the headache became more severe. She developed a left sixth cranial nerve palsy. A CT brain revealed bilateral fronto-parietal subdural hygromas with no evidence of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Following neurology and neurosurgical opinions, it was felt that there were no absolute contraindications to an epidural blood patch (EBP). Eight days following dural puncture, an EBP was performed. The headache immediately resolved. The sixth cranial nerve palsy resolved within a week of the EBP. There may be a role for neuroimaging in select cases of postdural puncture headache prior to EBP intervention such as those with localising neurological signs or atypical symptoms.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free