Evidence Hub

Contrast-induced neurotoxicity following diagnostic catheter cerebral angiography

Al Dabbagh A, Alanezi M, Balian VJ

BMJ case reports, 2026

Abstract

A man in his 60s was found to have a 7 mm incidental anterior communicating artery aneurysm on CT while being investigated for debilitating migraines, and subsequently underwent catheter cerebral angiography for endovascular treatment planning. Approximately 1 hour post angiogram, the patient reported reduced vision and a headache. His symptoms rapidly progressed to a severe headache, increased agitation, confusion, cortical blindness and combative behaviour. CT and MRI revealed no acute intracranial abnormality, and he was transferred to the intensive care unit for supportive care. His condition gradually improved, and he was discharged 4 days later with no focal neurological deficit. Contrast-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) was diagnosed as a diagnosis of exclusion. This case highlights the importance of recognising and managing CIN and shows that CT/MRI findings in the immediate setting of CIN may be normal. Thus, clinical recognition, early intervention and interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial for ensuring favourable outcomes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free