Evidence Hub

Case Report: Inflammatory CADASIL phenotype associated with a rare cysteine-sparing NOTCH3 variant

Madjidov A, Abbott MA, Mullen KM, Hicks R, Schlaug G

Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025

Abstract

We present a 50-year-old female who has a longstanding history of migraine with aura. She experienced one episode of partial visual field loss associated with a small acute/subacute lesion involving the cortex and subcortical white matter (showing contrast enhancement), alongside extensive white matter hyperintensities. Given these findings, CADASIL was suspected. Genetic testing identified a rare heterozygous NOTCH3 variant (c.6102dup, p.Gly2035Argfs*60), currently classified as a variant of uncertain significance. Concurrent cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed elevated myelin basic protein, an elevated IgG index, and 4 oligoclonal bands, indicating an inflammatory process. Her visual evoked potentials showed no evidence of optic nerve or tract impairment. Approximately 9 months later, the occipital lesion evolved into encephalomalacia and gliosis without enhancement, while the extensive white matter hyperintensities remained stable. A repeat lumbar puncture 1 year later showed persistently elevated myelin basic protein and IgG index, now with 7 oligoclonal bands (some shared with serum). Currently, her neurological examination is normal. She is managed on dual antiplatelet therapy, and her migraines are effectively controlled with calcium-channel blocker prophylaxis. Notably, her mother, diagnosed with multiple sclerosis for several decades despite imaging findings suggestive of CADASIL, shares the same NOTCH3 variant. One of her two children tested negative for the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free