Evidence Hub

Peculiar CADASIL phenotype in monozygotic twins carrying a novel NOTCH3 pathogenetic variant

Pascarella A, Manzo L, Marsico O, Gasparini S, Falcone E, Cammaroto S, Sabatini U, Aguglia U et al.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an autosomal dominantly inherited cerebral small vessel disease caused by Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3 (NOTCH3) gene mutations. The main clinical features include migraine with aura, recurrent ischemic strokes and dementia. Brain MRI typically shows multiple small lacunar infarcts and severe, diffuse, symmetrical white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), with characteristic involvement of the anterior temporal pole, external capsule, and superior frontal gyrus. Reports of twins with CADASIL are scarce. Herein we describe a pair of monozygotic twins with peculiar CADASIL phenotype, carrying a new NOTCH3 variant.

CASE PRESENTATION: Twin A was a 45-year-old male suffering from migraine, obesity, arterial hypertension, and polycythemia (with negative genetic analysis), who complained of a transient, short-lasting (~ 5 minutes) episode of speech difficulties. Brain MRI showed diffuse, symmetrical, confluent periventricular WMHs involving frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes and external capsules, with sparing of anterior temporal poles. Genetic analysis of NOTCH3 gene demonstrated the presence of missense c.3329G>A, p.(Cys1110Tyr) variant, confirming CADASIL diagnosis. Twin B, affected by migraine and polycythemia, as well as his monozygotic twin, presented with a 2-month history of trigeminal neuralgia. Brain MRI demonstrated diffuse WMHs with a pattern of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free