Evidence Hub

A Rare Case of Idiopathic Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome

Sehapovic V, Muhamed S, Singh H, Jones L

The American journal of case reports, 2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a rare disease that is classified as a condition of diffuse cerebral artery constriction. RCVS can be complicated with transient neurological deficits, seizures, ischemic strokes, and hemorrhagic strokes. A thunder-clap headache, described as being the worst headache a patient can experience, is the predominant symptom in RCVS, which contributes to why RCVS is underdiagnosed as an ischemic stroke or migraine. CASE REPORT In this case study, we present a healthy 34-year-old Black woman who presented to the Emergency Department 3 times over a period of 4 days with concerns of severe headaches. In her first Emergency Department visit, she had a normal computed tomography scan of the brain. Her third Emergency Department visit resulted in hospitalization due to seizures, and a computed tomography brain scan done then showed acute intracranial hemorrhaging. The patient ultimately received a diagnosis of RCVS during her hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS RCVS is the most notable mimicker of other similar-presenting vasculopathies, such as primary angiitis of the central nervous system and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. It is important to note that thunder-clap headache, as well as complications such as intracranial hemorrhaging and seizures, can arise not just from other diseases but from RCVS as well; hence, an early diagnosis is critical to avoid complications, especially if initial imaging is negative.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free