Evidence Hub

A potentially lethal interaction: Migraine, human immunodeficiency virus and ergotism – A primary care case report

Ismail Ahmad Sahli Mahzuz, Ismail Shaiful Bahari, Lili Husniati Yaacob

Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Ergotism is a rare but potentially serious condition characterised by peripheral vasospasm. Its diagnosis is challenging because the presentation varies depending on the type and location of the affected blood vessels. Ergot alkaloids, including ergotamine, are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4. Concurrent use of ergotamine with CYP3A4 inhibitors can significantly increase the risk of ergotism. However, this potentially dangerous drug interaction is often underestimated in general practice. Herein, we report the case of a middle- aged woman with a history of migraine headaches, who was treated with Cafergot (ergotamine tartrate and caffeine). After the initiation of human immunodeficiency virus therapy with Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir), she experienced recurrent episodes of bluish discoloration, livedo reticularis and tingling sensation in her upper and lower extremities over several years. Despite multiple hospital visits and extensive diagnostic workups, including normal blood investigations and biopsy, the correct diagnosis of ergotism-induced vasospasm due to ritonavir—ergotamine interaction was delayed. This diagnosis was supported by CT angiography, which demonstrated vasospasm of the femoral arteries. The patient’s symptoms significantly resolved following ergotamine discontinuation. Ergotism is a self-limiting condition that can be fatal if not recognised and treated promptly. This case highlights the importance of awareness, particularly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free