Evidence Hub

Early-onset stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy syndrome: A case report and review of the literature

Ariana Chow, G. Hovis, Farinaz Ghodrati, Maya Harary, Khashayar Mozaffari, Anjali Pradhan, J. Hegde, Isaac Yang

Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2024

6 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

Stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy (SMART) syndrome is characterized by migraines, seizures, and stroke-like symptoms following brain irradiation. Diagnosis consists of clinical signs, history of brain irradiation, and radiographic evaluation. The latency to onset varies widely among individual patients, ranging from 1 to 35 years. Herein, we review the literature and present a case of SMART syndrome with an onset of five months after stereotactic radiosurgery for a benign meningioma.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in line with the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for cases of SMART syndrome with reported time of onset and radiation dosage. Finally, we report the presentation, history, radiographic findings, and clinical outcomes of a 48-year-old female with suspected SMART syndrome.

RESULTS

Of 101 articles reviewed, 23 articles were selected for inclusion in the present study. A total of 27 cases were identified. The mean age at presentation was 43 years (range: 11-70), and 71.4 % of patients were male. The mean latency to onset was 11.2 years after radiation. Based on case descriptions, none of the patients were definitively treated with single fraction radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

SMART syndrome may present with variations in latency to onset, radiation dose, outcome, and clinical course. The present case of SMART syndrome highlights the variety in clinical presentation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free