Evidence Hub

Abstract number: ESOC2026A1166 persistence with botulinum toxin a and factors associated with discontinuation in patients with stroke: a retrospective cohort study

M. Wainberg, S. Page, Jinming Zhang, Nivedita Rangarajan, Sandeep Kumar, Jonathan Bouchard, Amandeep Mann, Mathieu Beneteau et al.

European Stroke Journal, 2026

407 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims BotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) is a guideline-recommended treatment for spasticity following stroke. We evaluated BoNT-A treatment persistence drivers of discontinuation and predictors of non-persistence in patients with stroke. Methods Eligible adults had received ≥1 treatment cycle with BoNT-A at the Mayo Clinic (January 2010–June 2023) and had an International Classification of Diseases (ICD9/10) code for stroke. Patients with ICD9/10 codes for migraine, cerebral palsy, cervical dystonia, or bladder dysfunction were excluded. Index date (baseline) was the date of first BoNT-A treatment; follow-up was 2 years post-index. Patients were persistent if all treatment intervals post-index were ≤the 80th percentile of all patients. Reasons for discontinuation were identified by AI natural language processing analysis of physicians’ free-text notes. Baseline characteristics associated with non-persistence were identified using step-wise logistic regression analyses. Results Overall, 407 patients were included. The 80th percentile of the BoNT-A treatment interval was 154 days; 5.7% of patients were persistent. Mean (95%CI) number of BoNT-A treatments over the 2-year follow-up was 2.43 (2.24–2.63) cycles. Comorbidity burden was high (Table 1). The most common reasons for BoNT-A discontinuation were patient- and physician-reported lack of treatment effectiveness (Table 2). Older age, Hispanic/Latino/unknown/undisclosed ethnicity, presence of comorbidities, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 407 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free